Showing posts with label birmingham. Show all posts
Showing posts with label birmingham. Show all posts
Monday, March 7, 2011
Wednesday, April 7, 2010
Tuesday, March 9, 2010
Tuesday, August 18, 2009
Thursday, August 13, 2009
Langford expands Birmingham civil rights arrest pardon proposal to include refunding fines
| Civil rights activists view arrest records |
Monday, August 3, 2009
Sunday, August 2, 2009
Saturday, August 1, 2009
Thursday, July 16, 2009
Thursday, June 18, 2009
Wednesday, May 20, 2009
Tuesday, February 3, 2009
Wednesday, December 17, 2008
Judge denies state Sen. E.B. McClain's request for a separate trial
Posted by Robert K. Gordon --- Birmingham News December 17, 2008 5:29 PM
A federal judge this evening denied state Sen. E.B. McClain's request to have a trial apart from co-defendant the Rev. Samuel Pettagrue, a move McClain's attorney says damages his defense.
"I'm disappointed in the court's ruling," McClain's attorney John Robbins said. "I'll discuss it with my client and assess our options."
Robbins said he likely will ask for a review of U.S. Magistrate Judge Michael Putnam's order.
Both men are scheduled for a Jan. 12 trial in U.S. District Court at Birmingham on charges of money laundering, mail fraud, conspiracy and bribery. Prosecutors contend McClain, D-Midfield, took nearly half of the $700,000 in state grants he helped to obtain for Pettagrue's community programs, including an online GED program. Prosecutors also say Pettagrue paid himself and his son more than $120,000 with the money.
Robbins argued that Pettagrue would be called to the stand to help McClain's defense if a separate trial were held and that having the trials together would preclude McClain from calling Pettagrue.
"The court is unconvinced that McClain has shown either a bona fide need for Pettagrue's testimony or that his testimony is exculpatory," Putnam said in a 10-page order.
A federal judge this evening denied state Sen. E.B. McClain's request to have a trial apart from co-defendant the Rev. Samuel Pettagrue, a move McClain's attorney says damages his defense.
"I'm disappointed in the court's ruling," McClain's attorney John Robbins said. "I'll discuss it with my client and assess our options."
Robbins said he likely will ask for a review of U.S. Magistrate Judge Michael Putnam's order.
Both men are scheduled for a Jan. 12 trial in U.S. District Court at Birmingham on charges of money laundering, mail fraud, conspiracy and bribery. Prosecutors contend McClain, D-Midfield, took nearly half of the $700,000 in state grants he helped to obtain for Pettagrue's community programs, including an online GED program. Prosecutors also say Pettagrue paid himself and his son more than $120,000 with the money.
Robbins argued that Pettagrue would be called to the stand to help McClain's defense if a separate trial were held and that having the trials together would preclude McClain from calling Pettagrue.
"The court is unconvinced that McClain has shown either a bona fide need for Pettagrue's testimony or that his testimony is exculpatory," Putnam said in a 10-page order.
Monday, December 15, 2008
Saturday, December 6, 2008
War On Dumb - Leapin’ Larry fights the feds
FROM: Birmingham Weekly
Langford indictment sets in motion momentous legal battle
By: Kyle Whitmire
Every year the Birmingham Regional Chamber of Commerce takes local leaders on a trip. The chamber calls it the “Big Trip,” an opportunity for our business and political elite to see a city similar to Birmingham, only more functional. There are panel discussions and seminars, mostly on municipal issues — transportation, economic development and the like. It was on one of these trips three years ago, to Nashville, that I saw some things that explain a lot about our mayor, Larry Langford.
One of the panel discussions focused on “diversity.” Despite the billing, there was no Asian panelist, no Latino, no gay. Instead, there were five black business leaders talking a lot about getting into restricted country clubs. One panelist, Tennessee commissioner of financial institutions Kevin Lavender, called Birmingham the most racist city in the country. He based his assessment on how he was treated here by a gas station attendant and his experience as a lunch guest at the Birmingham Country Club.
“I don’t care for your city because of those experiences that I’ve had in the last four or five years in Birmingham,” Lavender said.
Only one member of the Birmingham delegation defended the city. Then-County Commission President Langford blasted Lavender and the panelists. He invited them to visit Birmingham, because the city they described was not the city Langford knew, he said.
“And if I had $35,000 in disposable income, I damn sure wouldn’t give it to no golf club,” he said.
The panelists were suddenly silent. Langford received a standing ovation. The most hardened Birmingham cynic would have struggled to hold down an Amen or Hell, yeah. Had the mayoral election been held that day, I’m certain most of the people in that room would have voted for him, with the exception of then-Mayor Bernard Kincaid, who remained silent and inert through the Birmingham-bashing.
Afterward, outside Langford pulled on a cigarette while holding court with the other smokers.
“I’m not going to let that kind of bullshit stand,” Langford said. “Hell, I can go to Cullman and people don’t treat me like that.”
In the last year, I’ve heard a lot of people denigrating Birmingham voters for electing Langford mayor, sometimes in offensive and even racist terms — poor, ignorant, black. To that, I usually tell them this story and remind them of one important point — Langford had support from many demographics, including the most prominent CEOs in Birmingham. It wasn’t ignorance, class or race that seated Langford at City Hall. Rather, it was Birmingham’s insecurity complex.
Whether he’s defending the city against some snotty outsider or lecturing single parents about buying kids designer clothes, Langford deftly manipulates Birmingham’s confidence or lack thereof. There’s an emotional tug-of-war in this city’s heart, with pride on one side and shame on the other, and somewhere in the middle the mayor keeps one hand on the rope. As long as there is tension in that line, Langford is in control. Birmingham’s insecurity gives him his political power.
Political power is a tricky thing, though, and Langford has a complex of his own that complicates how he wields it. It’s easy but wrong to believe that money is power. In fact, money corrupts power. In his biography of Richard J. Daley, the late Chicago columnist Mike Royko attributed that mayor’s success to one basic idea: In politics, you can have power or you can have money, but you can’t have both. Daley let others make the money while he horded the power. He figured out what many other public officials missed. You can’t sell power and retain it at the same time. Once bought, always beholden. To attempt both is to mix a witches’ brew. Langford doesn’t seem to have learned that lesson.
At a cocktail party on that same trip to Nashville, I asked Langford about a rumor I’d heard — that HealthSouth CEO Richard Scrushy had bought him a $10,000 leather jacket for Christmas. Langford didn’t deny it. Instead, he became contemptuous of the question.
“People are always asking me about my clothes,” he said. “What am I supposed to wear? I don’t wear no cheap shit from J.C. Penny.”
Langford’s impulsiveness is as much a habit of his personal life as in his politics. At some point, most children decide that when they grow up they will eat only ice cream and cookies, but only Langford followed through on that promise. (That’s hardly an exaggeration. It’s well known among his friends and hangers-on that ice cream and cookies are staples of his diet.)
But when it comes to tastes beyond his palate, Langford is neither modest nor frugal. He drives a Cadillac Escalade, tells time with a Rolex and wears clothes few of his constituents could ever afford.
As it turns out, neither could he. Three years after that cocktail party in Nashville, Langford’s fondness for high-end fashion and his contempt for off-the-rack suits have led him into a dangerous place — the crosshairs of the federal government and the target of a 101-count indictment. The prosecutors’ accusation is simple even if the alleged scheme is not: Langford sold the power of his office for some really nice clothes.
*****
On Monday, Langford appeared in court wearing a brown sweater vest over a Burberry plaid shirt that retails for about $200. The shackles were free.
His arrest that morning seems to have surprised him, but it wasn’t unexpected. Birmingham’s political spectators have speculated for months on when the federal grand jury’s investigation would nab the mayor. The answer was Monday. On his way to Birmingham Budweiser, where he works in public relations, Langford noticed a sedan following him. When he reached the office parking lot, federal authorities took him into custody.
Word spread quickly that Langford had been arrested. Lawyers for his two co-defendants, Montgomery investment banker Bill Blount and lobbyist Al LaPierre, arranged for their less dramatic surrender. That piqued Langford’s lawyers, who later accused the Justice Department of being excessive with their client.
LaPierre, also with shackles on his ankles, faced the magistrate with Langford. Blount, who had to drive from Montgomery, appeared in court later.
The bond hearing and arraignment were mechanical, automatic and staid. The magistrate gave LaPierre and Langford each a $50,000 bond. Blount received a $100,000 bond. Because of his personal finances, Langford’s bond was unsecured. All three defendants waived their right to hear the indictment read and each pleaded not guilty, the only plea allowed in an initial appearance in federal court.
On the steps of the Hugo Black federal courthouse, Langford stood silently with his hands in his pockets as his attorney, Tom Baddley, spoke for him to the media scrum.
“Mayor Langford, I’m sure, would love to speak for one hour to every one of you, but we have asked him not to,” Baddley said. “Of course, if you know Larry, he doesn’t like that, but he’s not going to discuss it.”
According to Baddley, Langford had taken a polygraph test and passed. The defense had offered that information to the prosecutors and the grand jury, but they had not accepted it. Further, Langford had even offered to take a polygraph administered by the Justice Department, but the Justice Department had shown no interest, he said.
“Unfortunately other people have been allowed to surrender and take their time and Mayor Langford was arrested,” Baddley said. “He was put in shackles and here we stand today. It’s a terrible thing.”
While his lawyer spoke for him, cars honked at the mayor and he waved back at them.
“We love you,” one passerby shouted.
Langford, who had to leave his coat in his car when he was arrested, shivered and said, “I’m freezing.” The lawyers escorted their client away from the courthouse.
*****
The arrest and hearing were nearly identical to any other public corruption arraignment. The key item of interest Monday was the 101-count indictment.
A rough sketch of the indictment was already public knowledge. There was little in it that hadn’t been reported in the newspapers two or three years ago. However, its detail and specificity are a stark contrast to Langford’s past equivocation.
Some of the back-story was already laid out in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s lawsuit against the three defendants.
In 2002, Langford was elected to the Jefferson County Commission. He defeated Jeff Germany, who was under investigation for public corruption, himself. Shortly after the election, the SEC said, Langford approached LaPierre and Blount for a loan. He had accumulated $70,000 in debt, much of it in clothing store credit, the SEC has said.
Gus Mayer, an upscale clothing store in Homewood, sued Langford for unpaid bills. According to the SEC, Blount arranged for Langford to receive a six-month $50,000 unsecured loan from Colonial Bank, where Blount’s then-girlfriend worked. She approved the loan, which Langford used to pay his debts. However, Langford defaulted on the loan. LaPierre, in turn, borrowed $50,000 from the same bank, which he used to pay Langford’s note. According to both federal investigations, Blount later gave LaPierre the money he needed to repay the loan.
Despite his trouble repaying the loan from Colonial, he told SEC investigators in 2007 that he went back to the bank to borrow more money. Instead of a bank loan, however, Blount and LaPierre gave Langford $69,000 directly. According to the indictment, Langford used $12,000 of that money to pay for audio equipment from Likis Audio, and he paid another $12,000 to Shaia’s, an upscale men’s clothing store in Homewood. Langford deposited the remaining $45,000 in a personal bank account. In his SEC deposition, Langford said he needed the money to pay for dental bills. The indictment does not indicate how Langford spent the remaining $45,000.
The indictment does include new information about payments LaPierre and Blount made to Langford. In 2004, the men gave Langford $30,000 to pay his taxes.
And then there’s more clothes.
In his 2007 deposition with SEC investigators, Langford said Blount might have bought him a birthday gift on a trip to New York. The investigators asked him if he’d ever paid for anything else. Langford said he had not.
The following comes from Langford’s 2007 deposition with SEC investigators.
Q: “Has Mr. Blount ever paid any expenses on your behalf?”
A: “Like?”
Q: “Like any expenses at all, besides dinner or something; a credit card expense, a bill at a store; I mean any expenses over say $100 on your behalf?”
A: “Not that I remember. He maybe bought a shirt and tie once, but I bought him a shirt and a tie and a sport coat. So I couldn’t really say for certain, but we’ve exchanged gifts, and I know I’ve given him more than he’s ever given me.”
In fact, between 2003 and 2007 Blount and LaPierre paid about $88,000 for clothes, watches and jewelry for Langford, the indictment says. Most of the purchases were at Remon’s in downtown Birmingham, but at least six of them were at boutiques in New York.
Of 27 total purchases, only one was made in March. Langford’s birthday is March 17, St. Patrick’s Day.
All totaled, Langford received more than $236,000 in cash, clothes and jewelry from Blount and LaPierre. Almost all of the money originated from Blount, the indictment says. LaPierre served as a pass-through.
At the same time Blount and LaPierre were paying for Langford’s fashions, Langford was arranging lucrative bond work for Blount’s Montgomery investment bank, Blount Parrish. The indictment depicts an incremental give-and-take, with Langford, then-commission president and chairman of the county finance committee, directing work to Blount as Blount directed cash and gifts to him. On several occasions Langford required major investment banks, including JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs, to include Blount in bond deals and interest rate swaps.
During Langford’s tenure on the Jefferson County Commission, Blount Parrish received more than $7 million for the work.
At the time, Langford described these complicated interest rate swaps to the public as “refinancing,” like many households do to take advantage of lower interest rates. In fact, the deals were much more sophisticated, so much so that only a few finance specialists truly understood them. Langford bragged that the deals would save the county millions, but since then those deals have backfired, leaving Jefferson County teetering on the brink of bankruptcy.
By 2007, Langford would plead ignorance in his SEC deposition. He told investigators he wouldn’t know a swap advisor from a rubber band and that he depended on the county’s finance director and financial advisors to distinguish the good deals from bad.
*****
The mayor’s lawyer, Baddley, has been friends with Langford for nearly 30 years. When federal investigators began sifting through the Jefferson County bond deals, Langford turned to Baddley for help.
Against Baddley’s advice, Langford gave his sworn deposition to SEC investigators with only a county lawyer at his side. Langford has since said he should have heeded Baddley’s advice.
Langford’s defense against these charges will be straightforward. Baddley says they will argue that Langford never knew the money he received from LaPierre was coming from Blount. Langford assumed LaPierre had the money to make the personal loans between friends and that Langford intended to pay off the loans. Langford was embarrassed to have put himself in such a tight spot, so he didn’t report the loans on his filings with the Alabama Ethics Commission. That was a mistake, Baddley argues, but an understandable one.
It might be a struggle to persuade a jury, though. SEC documents show that there is at least one email between Langford and Blount about his loan at Colonial Bank. What’s more, that argument does not account for the thousands of dollars worth of clothes from Remon’s paid for with Blount’s credit card.
As for the business Langford directed to Blount, Baddley says that it was customary for the five commissioners to divide bond work equally, giving it to banks and brokers of their choosing. In this aspect, he is correct. The commission had been divvying out bond business that way long before Langford got there.
Furthermore, he says that it was only logical that Langford would involve someone he has known and trusted for 30 years — Blount.
One leftover curiosity from Monday is what wasn’t in the indictment. There have been other aspects of the grand jury investigation separate from Langford’s dealings with Blount. Witnesses have appeared to testify about various charities Langford has run, a multi-level marketing business Langford has with his wife selling phone service, and gambling Langford did at VictoryLand in Shorter, Ala. The same special grand jury indicted Langford’s friend, John Katopodis, on charges he misused funds from a charity they co-founded with Richard Scrushy, Computer Help for Kids.
However, when the indictment was unsealed Monday, there was only one spoke on the wagon wheel — the Blount, Langford, LaPierre conspiracy charges.
Baddley would not speculate on other aspects of the federal investigation, nor would United States Attorney Alice Martin comment on what else they might be looking at, except to say that the investigation is continuing.
Tuesday night in Linn Park, Langford moved through a crowd at the Birmingham Christmas parade. As marching bands performed in the street, he glad-handed supporters and climbed onto the stage where a few minutes later he would flip a ceremonial switch to light the city’s Christmas tree. Speaking to the crowd, he broke the palpable tension with a joke.
“After yesterday, I need a Merry Christmas,” he said.
War on Dumb is a column about political culture. Write to kyle@bhamweekly.com
Langford indictment sets in motion momentous legal battle
By: Kyle Whitmire
Every year the Birmingham Regional Chamber of Commerce takes local leaders on a trip. The chamber calls it the “Big Trip,” an opportunity for our business and political elite to see a city similar to Birmingham, only more functional. There are panel discussions and seminars, mostly on municipal issues — transportation, economic development and the like. It was on one of these trips three years ago, to Nashville, that I saw some things that explain a lot about our mayor, Larry Langford.
One of the panel discussions focused on “diversity.” Despite the billing, there was no Asian panelist, no Latino, no gay. Instead, there were five black business leaders talking a lot about getting into restricted country clubs. One panelist, Tennessee commissioner of financial institutions Kevin Lavender, called Birmingham the most racist city in the country. He based his assessment on how he was treated here by a gas station attendant and his experience as a lunch guest at the Birmingham Country Club.
“I don’t care for your city because of those experiences that I’ve had in the last four or five years in Birmingham,” Lavender said.
Only one member of the Birmingham delegation defended the city. Then-County Commission President Langford blasted Lavender and the panelists. He invited them to visit Birmingham, because the city they described was not the city Langford knew, he said.
“And if I had $35,000 in disposable income, I damn sure wouldn’t give it to no golf club,” he said.
The panelists were suddenly silent. Langford received a standing ovation. The most hardened Birmingham cynic would have struggled to hold down an Amen or Hell, yeah. Had the mayoral election been held that day, I’m certain most of the people in that room would have voted for him, with the exception of then-Mayor Bernard Kincaid, who remained silent and inert through the Birmingham-bashing.
Afterward, outside Langford pulled on a cigarette while holding court with the other smokers.
“I’m not going to let that kind of bullshit stand,” Langford said. “Hell, I can go to Cullman and people don’t treat me like that.”
In the last year, I’ve heard a lot of people denigrating Birmingham voters for electing Langford mayor, sometimes in offensive and even racist terms — poor, ignorant, black. To that, I usually tell them this story and remind them of one important point — Langford had support from many demographics, including the most prominent CEOs in Birmingham. It wasn’t ignorance, class or race that seated Langford at City Hall. Rather, it was Birmingham’s insecurity complex.
Whether he’s defending the city against some snotty outsider or lecturing single parents about buying kids designer clothes, Langford deftly manipulates Birmingham’s confidence or lack thereof. There’s an emotional tug-of-war in this city’s heart, with pride on one side and shame on the other, and somewhere in the middle the mayor keeps one hand on the rope. As long as there is tension in that line, Langford is in control. Birmingham’s insecurity gives him his political power.
Political power is a tricky thing, though, and Langford has a complex of his own that complicates how he wields it. It’s easy but wrong to believe that money is power. In fact, money corrupts power. In his biography of Richard J. Daley, the late Chicago columnist Mike Royko attributed that mayor’s success to one basic idea: In politics, you can have power or you can have money, but you can’t have both. Daley let others make the money while he horded the power. He figured out what many other public officials missed. You can’t sell power and retain it at the same time. Once bought, always beholden. To attempt both is to mix a witches’ brew. Langford doesn’t seem to have learned that lesson.
At a cocktail party on that same trip to Nashville, I asked Langford about a rumor I’d heard — that HealthSouth CEO Richard Scrushy had bought him a $10,000 leather jacket for Christmas. Langford didn’t deny it. Instead, he became contemptuous of the question.
“People are always asking me about my clothes,” he said. “What am I supposed to wear? I don’t wear no cheap shit from J.C. Penny.”
Langford’s impulsiveness is as much a habit of his personal life as in his politics. At some point, most children decide that when they grow up they will eat only ice cream and cookies, but only Langford followed through on that promise. (That’s hardly an exaggeration. It’s well known among his friends and hangers-on that ice cream and cookies are staples of his diet.)
But when it comes to tastes beyond his palate, Langford is neither modest nor frugal. He drives a Cadillac Escalade, tells time with a Rolex and wears clothes few of his constituents could ever afford.
As it turns out, neither could he. Three years after that cocktail party in Nashville, Langford’s fondness for high-end fashion and his contempt for off-the-rack suits have led him into a dangerous place — the crosshairs of the federal government and the target of a 101-count indictment. The prosecutors’ accusation is simple even if the alleged scheme is not: Langford sold the power of his office for some really nice clothes.
*****
On Monday, Langford appeared in court wearing a brown sweater vest over a Burberry plaid shirt that retails for about $200. The shackles were free.
His arrest that morning seems to have surprised him, but it wasn’t unexpected. Birmingham’s political spectators have speculated for months on when the federal grand jury’s investigation would nab the mayor. The answer was Monday. On his way to Birmingham Budweiser, where he works in public relations, Langford noticed a sedan following him. When he reached the office parking lot, federal authorities took him into custody.
Word spread quickly that Langford had been arrested. Lawyers for his two co-defendants, Montgomery investment banker Bill Blount and lobbyist Al LaPierre, arranged for their less dramatic surrender. That piqued Langford’s lawyers, who later accused the Justice Department of being excessive with their client.
LaPierre, also with shackles on his ankles, faced the magistrate with Langford. Blount, who had to drive from Montgomery, appeared in court later.
The bond hearing and arraignment were mechanical, automatic and staid. The magistrate gave LaPierre and Langford each a $50,000 bond. Blount received a $100,000 bond. Because of his personal finances, Langford’s bond was unsecured. All three defendants waived their right to hear the indictment read and each pleaded not guilty, the only plea allowed in an initial appearance in federal court.
On the steps of the Hugo Black federal courthouse, Langford stood silently with his hands in his pockets as his attorney, Tom Baddley, spoke for him to the media scrum.
“Mayor Langford, I’m sure, would love to speak for one hour to every one of you, but we have asked him not to,” Baddley said. “Of course, if you know Larry, he doesn’t like that, but he’s not going to discuss it.”
According to Baddley, Langford had taken a polygraph test and passed. The defense had offered that information to the prosecutors and the grand jury, but they had not accepted it. Further, Langford had even offered to take a polygraph administered by the Justice Department, but the Justice Department had shown no interest, he said.
“Unfortunately other people have been allowed to surrender and take their time and Mayor Langford was arrested,” Baddley said. “He was put in shackles and here we stand today. It’s a terrible thing.”
While his lawyer spoke for him, cars honked at the mayor and he waved back at them.
“We love you,” one passerby shouted.
Langford, who had to leave his coat in his car when he was arrested, shivered and said, “I’m freezing.” The lawyers escorted their client away from the courthouse.
*****
The arrest and hearing were nearly identical to any other public corruption arraignment. The key item of interest Monday was the 101-count indictment.
A rough sketch of the indictment was already public knowledge. There was little in it that hadn’t been reported in the newspapers two or three years ago. However, its detail and specificity are a stark contrast to Langford’s past equivocation.
Some of the back-story was already laid out in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s lawsuit against the three defendants.
In 2002, Langford was elected to the Jefferson County Commission. He defeated Jeff Germany, who was under investigation for public corruption, himself. Shortly after the election, the SEC said, Langford approached LaPierre and Blount for a loan. He had accumulated $70,000 in debt, much of it in clothing store credit, the SEC has said.
Gus Mayer, an upscale clothing store in Homewood, sued Langford for unpaid bills. According to the SEC, Blount arranged for Langford to receive a six-month $50,000 unsecured loan from Colonial Bank, where Blount’s then-girlfriend worked. She approved the loan, which Langford used to pay his debts. However, Langford defaulted on the loan. LaPierre, in turn, borrowed $50,000 from the same bank, which he used to pay Langford’s note. According to both federal investigations, Blount later gave LaPierre the money he needed to repay the loan.
Despite his trouble repaying the loan from Colonial, he told SEC investigators in 2007 that he went back to the bank to borrow more money. Instead of a bank loan, however, Blount and LaPierre gave Langford $69,000 directly. According to the indictment, Langford used $12,000 of that money to pay for audio equipment from Likis Audio, and he paid another $12,000 to Shaia’s, an upscale men’s clothing store in Homewood. Langford deposited the remaining $45,000 in a personal bank account. In his SEC deposition, Langford said he needed the money to pay for dental bills. The indictment does not indicate how Langford spent the remaining $45,000.
The indictment does include new information about payments LaPierre and Blount made to Langford. In 2004, the men gave Langford $30,000 to pay his taxes.
And then there’s more clothes.
In his 2007 deposition with SEC investigators, Langford said Blount might have bought him a birthday gift on a trip to New York. The investigators asked him if he’d ever paid for anything else. Langford said he had not.
The following comes from Langford’s 2007 deposition with SEC investigators.
Q: “Has Mr. Blount ever paid any expenses on your behalf?”
A: “Like?”
Q: “Like any expenses at all, besides dinner or something; a credit card expense, a bill at a store; I mean any expenses over say $100 on your behalf?”
A: “Not that I remember. He maybe bought a shirt and tie once, but I bought him a shirt and a tie and a sport coat. So I couldn’t really say for certain, but we’ve exchanged gifts, and I know I’ve given him more than he’s ever given me.”
In fact, between 2003 and 2007 Blount and LaPierre paid about $88,000 for clothes, watches and jewelry for Langford, the indictment says. Most of the purchases were at Remon’s in downtown Birmingham, but at least six of them were at boutiques in New York.
Of 27 total purchases, only one was made in March. Langford’s birthday is March 17, St. Patrick’s Day.
All totaled, Langford received more than $236,000 in cash, clothes and jewelry from Blount and LaPierre. Almost all of the money originated from Blount, the indictment says. LaPierre served as a pass-through.
At the same time Blount and LaPierre were paying for Langford’s fashions, Langford was arranging lucrative bond work for Blount’s Montgomery investment bank, Blount Parrish. The indictment depicts an incremental give-and-take, with Langford, then-commission president and chairman of the county finance committee, directing work to Blount as Blount directed cash and gifts to him. On several occasions Langford required major investment banks, including JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs, to include Blount in bond deals and interest rate swaps.
During Langford’s tenure on the Jefferson County Commission, Blount Parrish received more than $7 million for the work.
At the time, Langford described these complicated interest rate swaps to the public as “refinancing,” like many households do to take advantage of lower interest rates. In fact, the deals were much more sophisticated, so much so that only a few finance specialists truly understood them. Langford bragged that the deals would save the county millions, but since then those deals have backfired, leaving Jefferson County teetering on the brink of bankruptcy.
By 2007, Langford would plead ignorance in his SEC deposition. He told investigators he wouldn’t know a swap advisor from a rubber band and that he depended on the county’s finance director and financial advisors to distinguish the good deals from bad.
*****
The mayor’s lawyer, Baddley, has been friends with Langford for nearly 30 years. When federal investigators began sifting through the Jefferson County bond deals, Langford turned to Baddley for help.
Against Baddley’s advice, Langford gave his sworn deposition to SEC investigators with only a county lawyer at his side. Langford has since said he should have heeded Baddley’s advice.
Langford’s defense against these charges will be straightforward. Baddley says they will argue that Langford never knew the money he received from LaPierre was coming from Blount. Langford assumed LaPierre had the money to make the personal loans between friends and that Langford intended to pay off the loans. Langford was embarrassed to have put himself in such a tight spot, so he didn’t report the loans on his filings with the Alabama Ethics Commission. That was a mistake, Baddley argues, but an understandable one.
It might be a struggle to persuade a jury, though. SEC documents show that there is at least one email between Langford and Blount about his loan at Colonial Bank. What’s more, that argument does not account for the thousands of dollars worth of clothes from Remon’s paid for with Blount’s credit card.
As for the business Langford directed to Blount, Baddley says that it was customary for the five commissioners to divide bond work equally, giving it to banks and brokers of their choosing. In this aspect, he is correct. The commission had been divvying out bond business that way long before Langford got there.
Furthermore, he says that it was only logical that Langford would involve someone he has known and trusted for 30 years — Blount.
One leftover curiosity from Monday is what wasn’t in the indictment. There have been other aspects of the grand jury investigation separate from Langford’s dealings with Blount. Witnesses have appeared to testify about various charities Langford has run, a multi-level marketing business Langford has with his wife selling phone service, and gambling Langford did at VictoryLand in Shorter, Ala. The same special grand jury indicted Langford’s friend, John Katopodis, on charges he misused funds from a charity they co-founded with Richard Scrushy, Computer Help for Kids.
However, when the indictment was unsealed Monday, there was only one spoke on the wagon wheel — the Blount, Langford, LaPierre conspiracy charges.
Baddley would not speculate on other aspects of the federal investigation, nor would United States Attorney Alice Martin comment on what else they might be looking at, except to say that the investigation is continuing.
Tuesday night in Linn Park, Langford moved through a crowd at the Birmingham Christmas parade. As marching bands performed in the street, he glad-handed supporters and climbed onto the stage where a few minutes later he would flip a ceremonial switch to light the city’s Christmas tree. Speaking to the crowd, he broke the palpable tension with a joke.
“After yesterday, I need a Merry Christmas,” he said.
War on Dumb is a column about political culture. Write to kyle@bhamweekly.com
Lawyer says Birmingham Mayor Larry Langford treated differently than others in arrest
Right to Remain Silent - Keb Mo
Wednesday, December 3, 2008
Larry Langford’s Greatest Hits - Birmingham Weekly
Thirty years in the taking
By: Kyle Whitmire
Three years ago, then-Jefferson County Commission President Larry Langford led a reading group at the Summit Barnes & Noble. It was a monthly event, organized by the store, at which local celebrities discussed their favorite books. In most cases, the celebrity picks were easy-reading pop-culture pap — Who Moved My Cheese? or the latest Oprah favorite. But not Langford’s choices. He chose two books, each of which seemed oddly indicative of his character, his career, his persona, his politics.
Langford’s first book was The Screwtape Letters by C. S. Lewis. A moralizing satire, the book takes the form of correspondence between a senior demon in hell, Screwtape, and his nephew, Wormwood, a devil-in-training who’s having trouble corrupting a young Christian. Screwtape instructs his nephew on the gradualism of sin and its usefulness in spoiling a good soul.
Langford’s second selection was The Prince by Niccolo Machiavelli. It is at once one of the more important works in Western political thought and also a handbook for how to be a dictator. In the last 400 years, its author’s name has been twisted into an adjective: Machiavellian, meaning ruthless, ambitious and without conscience. The most quoted line: “It is better to be feared than loved.”
It was as though, for a moment, he dropped the stage act, just long enough to let us know he was smarter and more complex than he had otherwise let on. But those who had been paying attention to his political career did not need the reminder [..more..]
Tuesday, December 2, 2008
Birmingham Mayor Accused of Trading County Deals for Cash and Clothes
NYT
December 2, 2008
Birmingham Mayor Accused of Trading County Deals for Cash and Clothes
By KYLE WHITMIRE and ADAM NOSSITER
BIRMINGHAM, Ala. — The mayor of this city, Larry P. Langford, was arrested by federal agents Monday and charged with taking bribes in exchange for doling out county financial business to a favored firm when he led the Jefferson County Commission from 2002 to 2006.
Mr. Langford, 60, was charged in the 101-count indictment with taking over $230,000 in cash, clothing and jewelry in exchange for ensuring that a widely known Alabama investment banker, William B. Blount, took part in lucrative bond deals related to the financing of improvements to Jefferson County’s failing sewer system. Those deals have led the county, which includes Birmingham, to the brink of bankruptcy.
Mr. Langford, as president of the County Commission, was in a position to insist that Mr. Blount be included in the complex financing handled primarily by large outside firms like JPMorgan Chase and Goldman Sachs, federal authorities said Monday in announcing the indictment. From 2003 to 2006, Mr. Blount and his company received over $7.1 million in fees, said the United States attorney here, Alice Martin.
Mr. Blount and Albert W. LaPierre, a widely known Democratic Party activist and lobbyist whom Ms. Martin described as an “intermediary,” were also arrested Monday and charged in the indictment. The charges included conspiracy, bribery, fraud and money laundering.
“Langford steered lucrative business to William Blount and his company,” Ms. Martin said at a news conference, “and with the help of lobbyist Albert LaPierre, they ensured that Larry Langford’s crushing personal debts were paid off, through payoffs of loans, store charge accounts, purchases of jewelry and clothing and other items of value.”
She called the arrangement a “pay-to-play scheme” and described how the authorities believed it worked: “Blount would pay Langford to get county business, and LaPierre acted as an intermediary to facilitate the delivery of bribes or the payment of Langford’s bills to various creditors. The co-conspirators simply paid his bills for expensive clothing and jewelry at New York City boutiques and at specialty stores in the Birmingham area.”
Mr. Langford, Mr. LaPierre and Mr. Blount pleaded not guilty in federal court here Monday, and were freed on bond. Mr. Langford has previously said the investigation of him was politically motivated. Mr. Blount is a former state Democratic Party chairman, and Mr. LaPierre is a former executive director of the party in Alabama. Mr. Langford is also a Democrat. Ms. Martin was appointed by President Bush.
In his decades in the public eye here, Mr. Langford has steadily built an image as a flamboyant, high-rolling political figure with a penchant for expensive clothing, and Monday’s indictment only filled out that portrait. In his first year as mayor, he has proposed a $500 million domed stadium, made an unlikely push to host the Olympics and dressed himself in sackcloth for a mass repentance rally at a city auditorium.
Page after page of the indictment chronicles luxury shopping the authorities say benefited the mayor: a $12,015 watch at Tourneau in New York on Nov. 9, 2004, paid for by Mr. Blount; $895 at Salvatore Ferragamo two days earlier, also paid by Mr. Blount; $4,250 at one of the mayor’s favorite stores, Remon’s in Birmingham, on Oct. 13, 2004; and many more such transactions, particularly at Remon’s.
Mr. Langford, meanwhile, was shepherding the complicated bond deals and interest-rate swaps that were supposed to reduce costs for his county, but have wound up leaving it with more than $3.2 billion in debt on its sewer system and facing what could be the nation’s largest municipal bankruptcy. With millions in payments due, local politicians are sharply divided over whether to file for bankruptcy.
Mr. Blount was at the center of the shopping-financing nexus laid out in the indictment, with a clothing purchase or loan to Mr. Langford occurring soon after or before the bond deals. On July 1, 2003, for instance, Mr. Langford and the County Commission approved an interest-rate swap with J.P. Morgan Securities and Bank of America for $1.1 billion, according to the indictment; three weeks later, in New York, Mr. Blount paid $2,850 to a luxury store for clothing for Mr. Langford; and on July 28 Mr. Blount and his companies got $2.6 million from JPMorgan Chase.
“Langford used his position to make it a condition that those financial institutions include Blount Parrish in those deals, and paid Blount Parrish a fee in order to get the county financing business,” Ms. Martin said at the news conference, referring to Mr. Blount’s investment banking firm in Montgomery, Ala. Ms. Martin said Mr. Blount’s firm had not been used by Jefferson County in financial matters before Mr. Langford became president of the County Commission.
Mr. Langford was arrested Monday morning at his office at Birmingham Budweiser, where he is a spokesman. Outside the courthouse, his lawyer, Thomas E. Baddley, said: “Someone innocent today has been charged. I am surprised and disappointed. First off, Mayor Langford took a polygraph test some time ago, and he passed that with flying colors.”
Mr. Baddley added: “He was put in shackles, and here we stand today. It’s a terrible thing.”
The three men faced similar accusations in a civil suit filed by the Securities and Exchange Commission last spring, in which Mr. Blount was accused of secretly giving the mayor tens of thousands of dollars while he secured lucrative fees for Mr. Blount’s firm.
Kyle Whitmire reported from Birmingham, and Adam Nossiter from New Orleans.
December 2, 2008
Birmingham Mayor Accused of Trading County Deals for Cash and Clothes
By KYLE WHITMIRE and ADAM NOSSITER
BIRMINGHAM, Ala. — The mayor of this city, Larry P. Langford, was arrested by federal agents Monday and charged with taking bribes in exchange for doling out county financial business to a favored firm when he led the Jefferson County Commission from 2002 to 2006.
Mr. Langford, 60, was charged in the 101-count indictment with taking over $230,000 in cash, clothing and jewelry in exchange for ensuring that a widely known Alabama investment banker, William B. Blount, took part in lucrative bond deals related to the financing of improvements to Jefferson County’s failing sewer system. Those deals have led the county, which includes Birmingham, to the brink of bankruptcy.
Mr. Langford, as president of the County Commission, was in a position to insist that Mr. Blount be included in the complex financing handled primarily by large outside firms like JPMorgan Chase and Goldman Sachs, federal authorities said Monday in announcing the indictment. From 2003 to 2006, Mr. Blount and his company received over $7.1 million in fees, said the United States attorney here, Alice Martin.
Mr. Blount and Albert W. LaPierre, a widely known Democratic Party activist and lobbyist whom Ms. Martin described as an “intermediary,” were also arrested Monday and charged in the indictment. The charges included conspiracy, bribery, fraud and money laundering.
“Langford steered lucrative business to William Blount and his company,” Ms. Martin said at a news conference, “and with the help of lobbyist Albert LaPierre, they ensured that Larry Langford’s crushing personal debts were paid off, through payoffs of loans, store charge accounts, purchases of jewelry and clothing and other items of value.”
She called the arrangement a “pay-to-play scheme” and described how the authorities believed it worked: “Blount would pay Langford to get county business, and LaPierre acted as an intermediary to facilitate the delivery of bribes or the payment of Langford’s bills to various creditors. The co-conspirators simply paid his bills for expensive clothing and jewelry at New York City boutiques and at specialty stores in the Birmingham area.”
Mr. Langford, Mr. LaPierre and Mr. Blount pleaded not guilty in federal court here Monday, and were freed on bond. Mr. Langford has previously said the investigation of him was politically motivated. Mr. Blount is a former state Democratic Party chairman, and Mr. LaPierre is a former executive director of the party in Alabama. Mr. Langford is also a Democrat. Ms. Martin was appointed by President Bush.
In his decades in the public eye here, Mr. Langford has steadily built an image as a flamboyant, high-rolling political figure with a penchant for expensive clothing, and Monday’s indictment only filled out that portrait. In his first year as mayor, he has proposed a $500 million domed stadium, made an unlikely push to host the Olympics and dressed himself in sackcloth for a mass repentance rally at a city auditorium.
Page after page of the indictment chronicles luxury shopping the authorities say benefited the mayor: a $12,015 watch at Tourneau in New York on Nov. 9, 2004, paid for by Mr. Blount; $895 at Salvatore Ferragamo two days earlier, also paid by Mr. Blount; $4,250 at one of the mayor’s favorite stores, Remon’s in Birmingham, on Oct. 13, 2004; and many more such transactions, particularly at Remon’s.
Mr. Langford, meanwhile, was shepherding the complicated bond deals and interest-rate swaps that were supposed to reduce costs for his county, but have wound up leaving it with more than $3.2 billion in debt on its sewer system and facing what could be the nation’s largest municipal bankruptcy. With millions in payments due, local politicians are sharply divided over whether to file for bankruptcy.
Mr. Blount was at the center of the shopping-financing nexus laid out in the indictment, with a clothing purchase or loan to Mr. Langford occurring soon after or before the bond deals. On July 1, 2003, for instance, Mr. Langford and the County Commission approved an interest-rate swap with J.P. Morgan Securities and Bank of America for $1.1 billion, according to the indictment; three weeks later, in New York, Mr. Blount paid $2,850 to a luxury store for clothing for Mr. Langford; and on July 28 Mr. Blount and his companies got $2.6 million from JPMorgan Chase.
“Langford used his position to make it a condition that those financial institutions include Blount Parrish in those deals, and paid Blount Parrish a fee in order to get the county financing business,” Ms. Martin said at the news conference, referring to Mr. Blount’s investment banking firm in Montgomery, Ala. Ms. Martin said Mr. Blount’s firm had not been used by Jefferson County in financial matters before Mr. Langford became president of the County Commission.
Mr. Langford was arrested Monday morning at his office at Birmingham Budweiser, where he is a spokesman. Outside the courthouse, his lawyer, Thomas E. Baddley, said: “Someone innocent today has been charged. I am surprised and disappointed. First off, Mayor Langford took a polygraph test some time ago, and he passed that with flying colors.”
Mr. Baddley added: “He was put in shackles, and here we stand today. It’s a terrible thing.”
The three men faced similar accusations in a civil suit filed by the Securities and Exchange Commission last spring, in which Mr. Blount was accused of secretly giving the mayor tens of thousands of dollars while he secured lucrative fees for Mr. Blount’s firm.
Kyle Whitmire reported from Birmingham, and Adam Nossiter from New Orleans.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
A Hollow Inheritance: The Legacies of the Tuskegee Civic Association and the Crusade for Civic Democracy in Alabama by Gabriel Antoine Smi...
